Connecting off-chain technical forensics, legal expert reports, and cryptographic validation within ERC-3643 & Web3 smart contracts.
Connecting off-chain technical forensics, legal expert reports, and cryptographic validation within ERC-3643 & Web3 smart contracts.
The canonical, open-source technical documentation for the Prop Trust Verified Standard (PTVS v1.0) and the Physical Forensic Oracle Infrastructure.
The Forensics Oracle Initiative (PFOI) operates as the neutral, open-source standardization body for physical asset verification in digital markets. Distinct from commercial implementation, PFOI defines the Layer 0 Physical Reality (L0-PR) protocol: the foundational layer that cryptographically anchors off-chain forensic truth to on-chain identity registries.
This architecture resolves the “Physical Oracle Gap” by mandating that all physical state changes of a tokenized Real-World Asset (RWA) be verified by a Prop Trust Certified Expert (PTCE), documented in a Qualified Forensic Evidence Record (QFER) signed with eIDAS 2.0 QES, and immutably hashed on-chain.
The following specifications define the technical interfaces, data schemas, and operational logic of the PTVS ecosystem. All RFCs are open for public review and implementation.
Defines the technical interface and data schema for injecting off-chain forensic verification data into on-chain identity registries (e.g., ERC-3643). Specifies the IPTVSClaimInjector.sol interface, QFER hash anchoring, and eIDAS 2.0 QES validation requirements.
Specifies the Day-2 operational resilience module of PTVS. Defines the deterministic smart contract responses to continuous physical degradation, including Trading Circuit Breakers, Automated Yield Gating, Atomic Capex Escrow Release, and Parametric Physical Integrity Cover (PIPC) integration.
Defines the mathematical and algorithmic specification for determining the Prop Trust Rating Board (PRRB) score (ranging from AAA to F). Establishes deterministic risk classification based on physical pathology severity, functional obsolescence, and legal compliance.
Specifies the integration standard for bridging physical property registry records (EU land registries and common law title systems) with on-chain identity tokens, ensuring absolute functional equivalence between legal ownership and digital tokens.
Defines the JSON data schemas, cryptographic hashing structures, and Qualified Electronic Signature (QES) + Qualified Timestamping requirements for packaging forensic reports into legally admissible digital evidence.
Specifies the metrological transformation of 3D point clouds, BIM models, and perquisite photogrammetry into verifiable cryptographic hashes on-chain, certifying precise volumetric and geometrical asset status.
Defines the legal and technical operational framework during issuer insolvency scenarios, specifying automated smart contract segregation of physical reserves and safeguarding tokenholder priority claims.
Specifies the integration gateway for certified industrial IoT hardware (such as vibration meters, sonometers, and electrical telemetry) feeding continuous physical metrics directly into APRIS circuit breakers.
The technical specifications are grounded in a comprehensive, open-source legal framework designed for voluntary adoption by legislators, regulators, and credit institutions. Governed by the PropTrust Association (Zug, Switzerland).
| Document | Scope | Canonical Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Corpus Legislativum PTVS v1.0 | The Lex Mercatoria of Physical Truth (6 Libers: Verification, Property, Evidence, Insolvency, Capital, Insurance). | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21719175 |
| Comparative Regulatory Benchmarking | Technical analysis of PTVS compatibility with MiCA (EU), MAS Project Guardian (SG), and ADGM Digital Asset Rules (UAE). | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23434629 |
| Systemic Risk Stress Test (APRIS) | Quantitative modeling of cascade probability reduction (94.7%) and capital delta under BCBS SCO60. | View Live Analysis |
The PTVS architecture and the L0-PR protocol are explicitly engineered to satisfy the rigorous technical and operational controls demanded by leading global regulatory authorities across Europe, the Middle East, and Asia.
| Jurisdiction & Framework | Key Regulatory Requirement | PTVS Technical & Operational Implementation |
|---|---|---|
| European Union MiCA (Arts. 36, 46 & 58) |
Sufficient reserve assets, custody segregation, and operational resilience (business continuity). | LO-PR Immutable Registry + Continuous PRRB Rating + Automated ForensicFreezeTriggered circuit breakers (RFC-002). |
| European Union eIDAS 2.0 Regulation |
Cross-border legal admissibility of electronic evidence and secure trust services. | Mandatory Qualified Electronic Signatures (QES) + Qualified Timestamps on all QFER physical evidence injections. |
| Singapore MAS (Project Guardian) |
Trust architectures, risk management, and secure cross-border settlement for tokenized assets. | Atomic Receiver Protocol + Parametric Physical Integrity Cover (PIPC) + Verifiable Claim Injection. |
| Abu Dhabi / UAE ADGM Digital Asset Framework |
Robust governance, transparency of underlying assets, and institutional risk mitigation. | PropTrust Association neutral governance + Public RFC Registry on GitHub + Immutable On-Chain Hash Anchoring. |
| Basel Committee BCBS SCO60 |
Prudential treatment of cryptoasset exposures and classification criteria. | Deterministic forensic evidence enabling Group 1a/1b classification through verifiable physical integrity. |